Thursday, October 28, 2021

How India Would Be If It Was Still Ruled By The British

Must read

Most people believe that we would have been very strong economically if we had never agreed to trade with the Britishers. The fact is: Britishers inflicted unemployment, famines, and other atrocities upon India. But like the two sides of a coin, there are always two viewpoints in every discussion. Though the British destroyed India’s essence, it also made India strong enough to attain new heights by bringing in new reforms, technologies, and modernization. This was the foundation of a new and sturdy nation.

Before the British came to India

Before the British came, we had no essence and no idea of Indian nationality. India was divided by many kings; some had large empires while some ruled just a city, but the people lived peacefully. Muslims ruled India for a long time, and India flourished during their rule and flourished even more when the Mughal family came to rule it.

British came and Ruined Our Economy.

Things changed after the British came, and the saying “divide and conquer” effect began to take its control from the ruling family to themselves. And only after the British came to India did we see 500 princely states fighting with each other. We also witnessed how the kings and landlords started sucking the blood out of the common person due to the lack of democracy, governance, law, and justice.

Giveaways

Indians have always blamed the British for ruining our wealth and resources, but if they had not come to our country, we would not have seen the light of modernization. British rule has definitely brought a good influence on India’s development. India would have never been united if the British didn’t rule us. Without the Britishers, Mumbai wouldn’t have become the economic and financial capital of India. We would not have turned Delhi into New Delhi. They introduced railway infrastructure, airways, and English education. Their contributions to India also include the largest metropolitan cities, the armed forces, the civil services, modern education, and much more that keep this nation united.

Development of Education System in India during British rule

The British introduced the Macaulay system of education and built hundreds of new schools, universities, and colleges for the higher education of the Indian population. They did it for the Indians and not for themselves. They trained much of the independence movement to British ideals, and these forward-thinking ideas were set up by the British and germinated in the Indian university campuses. They also introduced Indians to western knowledge and spread western culture. But with western culture, Indians also learned about democracy and nationalism. The ideas of liberty and freedom spread, and people recognized the oppression they were under and raised their voices.  Thus, because of the Britishers, India is now the second-largest English-speaking nation, and it has carved out a reputed position for itself in the world.

Introduced Railway Service

Unlike the other colonizers, the Britishers, instead of spoiling all the local resources and leaving nothing behind, ignoring the locals, and killing the intelligentsia, have actually tried to establish a greater and more prosperous British Empire. The British laid the foundations of the first passenger train from Mumbai to Thane on 16 April 1853. But the fact remains that railways were made to ship out the raw materials from India to Britain and sell it back to India at higher costs. They constructed 70,000 miles of concrete road and 40,000 miles of railroads. Transportation had never been so cheap, fast, and easy in India.

Under British rule, we witnessed new and never seen technologies like electricity and air transport. India got developed, left behind the medieval age, and rushed into a new technologically advanced nation. Presently, Indian Railways is the largest rail network in Asia and offers employment to millions of people. We can’t imagine India without railways and roads.

Indians Cherish even today.

British rule has also brought Cricket to India, and it is certainly the only thing that has the power to bring together the entire nation. India would have probably lacked behind in tea plantations without the British rule because they were the ones to import tea from China to India.

Takeaways

The first consequence was that Pakistan got themselves separated from India, and Bangladesh followed the same thing. The reason is that the British only thought of having more area added to their empire and did not come to help any human being except for the ones that served them. Their first and foremost aim was to attain all our wealth. Do you know? One of the most valuable diamonds (Koh-i-Noor) was originally from India, and it is now in England!

Eradicating ‘Sati’ Systems and Abolishing ‘Thugs’

“The indisputable fact is that India as a nation, as it stands today, was originally put together and created by a small, distant island country. It is important to note that there is a substantial list on the credit side. They include railways, roads, canals, mines, sewers, plantations, and the establishment of English law and language. Great cities, including Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras, were built, and some of the finest universities and museums in India were founded by the British.

The first definitive atlas of India was drawn, and there were great social reforms, such as the eradication of violent highway robbery, the banning of the custom of Sati (the burning of widows on the husband’s funeral pyre), and female infanticide. Perhaps most innovative of all was the bringing together of several different states into one unified India.

The 200-year window of British governance was perhaps the only period in a thousand years of Indian history to date when the minorities and people of different religions felt more secure and less discriminated against, with a notable absence of killings, conflicts, and persecutions. Although there were wrongs committed by the British against India, as widely recognized by the British themselves, there was much more and remained positive. The sheer audacity and scale of such an endeavor, the courage and enterprise have no parallel in world history,” says Dr. Kartar Lalvani, founder of the vitamins company Vitabiotics.

Some facts every Indian should be aware of

Caste discrimination continues, women do not get their rights, female foeticide remains. Indeed, Indians were never treated as equals by the British, but it is equally true that they were treated at least better than the caste system treated them. British have also put an end to barbaric practices like Sati. Initially, India was exploited and pillaged by the British Empire, but the truth is also that the British neither had enough resources to control India nor good control of Indians. The British wouldn’t have left India if India was a huge financial asset to Britain. And if they had stayed, they would’ve continued to take India on the path of modernization. They left India with the slightest appearance of modern law, primary and higher education, industrialization, and modern medicine.

Would India be better off if it was still under British control?

While many people still feel that India would have been worse off under the British, be careful not to forget the positive impacts on the Indian nation. But it is also agreed that it wouldn’t have been better if the British still ruled us because they were systematically stealing from India, milking out its resources and wealth, and never considered Indians as equals but rather to be their slaves and laborers.

Conclusion

If the Britishers were still ruling Indians, there would have surely been much better infrastructure, but it was possible that most of the Indians would have either died in the wars of other countries or would have continued to be slaves to the Britishers living in India. And most of our useful resources, which still exist in India, would have been taken away.


 

 

About the author

More articles

11 COMMENTS

  1. Wec know that British Modernised india built many structure man made beauty was also built by them . But india would have been the richest country in the world constituting about 78% of total wealth in the world .
    And whatever they built in India was by our own money.

  2. yeah but this is nothing compared to what they put indians through. they came to probably the most resourceful and rickest country at that time and they took everything

  3. They really made us suffered a lot. Really bad to see a indian writing good about english people.

  4. I am not sure if you have discussed the question of “would India be better off under the British” in the light of how the English society evolved during and after the Indian Independence, and the societal changes that took place in the west.

  5. The only reasonable point I found in this article is the abolishing of Sati. I can go into details providing reference and refuting each and every single point here but I won’t because it is self-evident. Further, was India flourishing under the Mughals an the Muslim leaders? Really? Why are you so hellbent on whitewashing history?
    Don’t allow “political correctness” to go to such an extent here it starts destroying history. The Mughal and the British were one of the worst things that ever happened to India. Infrastructure? LOL. So they were taking money, metal, workers, resources and every single thin necessary to craft those railways and they gave it to us? Stupid article. This topic has so much potential and it is funny how you failed it.
    And finally, to the moderators of this website, this article has become less about how India would have been and more about how Britishers were good. Why do I smell propoganda?

  6. What kind of utter stupid sentence is that British taking our money, metal and workers and resources to build railway. So if someone is building something locally are you supposed to bring metal, resources and workers from the land which is 6000 miles away (England) or Would use whatever readily available in close distance. If some Indians would have started building railway, wouldn’t they use metal, resources, money and workers locally. Only one information wasn’t so good——Indians flourishing in Muslim rule.

    Otherwise this article is excellent.

  7. You’re making it sound like Indians were savages, when in reality, the British brought homophobia and the concept of “modesty” in India.

  8. Not only the one who wrote this article, but most of the google search results are biased to British. Not sure why…Reality is that British took all of our wealth and left India poor, they brought railway etc just to easily access Indian resources.. Saw lots of post saying without British there would not having India.. Yes.. There would not be a corrupted poor nation India, but there would be smaller rich countries like in Europe where people will have better living standards than present India. Heard somewhere that Britain saying to their new generation that they came to India to show Indians how to live descent.. If Indian writers can praise British no wonder why they saying like that..

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Living Life