A celebrity, a big hero of Bollywood, had left a comment that backed intolerance that created a significant debate on all kinds of media. Aamir Khan said that he would like to leave India because of intolerance. Is that what he said? What he said was, “my wife is reading about the intolerance in newspapers daily and for our child’s future, she is asking me to leave India.” This was what he had said. The same could be portrayed in many ways, either good or bad.
First of all, I would like to differentiate AAMIR KHAN from the other heroes of India. Every actor acts for money. Even Aamir does that. But every artist does not give a social message in their movies like he does. His role in ‘SATYAMEV JAYATE‘ – was a remarkable one. No big hero has enough courage to perform such roles. Aamir does.
His last movie ‘PK’ had enough problems both before and after release because of some caste and religious freaks. Despite that stuff, the movie was a big hit. In that film, Aamir asks various silly questions about religious beliefs, yet those stupid questions mean a lot. Don’t they? Why can’t we take this issue, too, as a behavior of real pk? This is because even this question meant a lot.
Next, if it is India or Child for a Mother, every mother will choose her child, and that is why Aamir’s wife said that. ( The above line is taken from Facebook ). Every mom will need to care for her child, and if Aamir’s wife felt like that, why did others burst out at her?
Next, India is a democratic country. Isn’t it? Everybody have the right to say their opinion. So Aamir said what he said.
Let us consider a situation. Assume a family that has a mother, father and two children. If any of them gets tensed, they express it by saying, “I feel like getting away from home.” Do they get away? No. Psychologically speaking, that is a kind of love. The home is more important for Aamir, which is why he said that.
Newspapers were the source of that kind of statement. What kind of news made them sayย so?
- Raping a 13-year-old child could be read still.
- Scam could be read still
- Murder could be read still
- Robbery could be read still
- Fighting for a cow could be read still
- Caste, religious fight could be read still
The above statements are true and could be seen in the newspaper every morning, but how could that statement become false?
I question whether the “statement” made them annoyed, or the term ‘KHAN’ made them annoyed and ‘them’ here refers to the pseud and bhakti.
Overall, the problem is about intolerance in India. Many writers and film artists gave back the awards because of this. After this, the topic became hot in India. The origin of intolerance was a manย who was killed by a mob for eating beef. “Cow is a sacred animal” was the reason for hisย slaughter. Is this reason enough to prove that their deadly act is legal? No.
We had a lot of religious fights, fights for God, fights for caste, fights for superiority religion, fight for a place to God, but this religious fight is for an animal.
- If you love the cow , feed it.
- If you love beef, eat it.
- If you believe in cow , pray to it.
- If you need money, trade it.
- It’s up to us.
India is a democratic country. Everyone has a right to talk and a right to eat. Think wisely. What Aamir said was true, and I hope those statements will keep a dot for this controversy. Lord, Save India.Jaihind!
Last Updated on by Sathi
Top Comments