This Independence Day, let’s talk about something different, like how Britishers’ misinterpretation gave birth to the Indian caste system. This article will talk about The British Caste System and India.
Invaders like the British tried to understand our society, culture, and language and failed rigorously. They interpreted our society with the presumption that India is a backward society with old practices and superstitions.
Her rich culture and dharmic principles were ridiculed in every possible way. All they wanted from their studies was to find loopholes in our system and to disparage our way of life. They wanted to spread the myth of superiority in the western way of living. Their main idea was to make us feel inferior and accept slavery.
Most bloggers, writers, journalists, and even the so-called think tanks of India talk only about the materialistic losses during colonial rule. Shashi Tharoor’s speech in Oxford went viral on the internet. But somehow, even he mentions and talks only about what India has lost financially.
Colonial rulers were efficacious in altering our society. The British caste system is one such thing that replaced Varna Vyavasta. But we lost something more important than that; we lost our educational system, culture, and philosophy.
Like many languages, Sanskrit is also a non-translatable language. One cannot replace the word “Yoga” with “Aerobics” though Yoga seems like a mere physical exercise, it’s not. Yoga has inveterate spirituality, whereas Aerobics doesn’t have any. Same with the word “Shakthi,” it cannot be replaced by “Energy” Shakthi is a divine form of energy.
When we consume food, we get energy but not Shakthi.
Such replacement of Sanskrit words will go wrong horrendously. Such replacement gave birth to the evil caste system in our society. That’s why I called it “THE BRITISH CASTE SYSTEM.”
The Sanskrit words “Jati” and “Varna” are replaced by “community” and “caste.” Jati is a group of people living together with something in common like language, profession, culture, etc. Varna is something that is decided by one’s Karma (actions) but not by one’s birth. In one Jati or even in one family, there can be people from different Varnas. Whereas the caste is something, one gets as a hereditary social class.
There were only four varnas, Brahman, Kshatriya, Vaisya, and Sudra. One will be entitled to Varna based on his Karma.
Vishwamitra, known as Sage of Sages, was born to a charioteer (Kshatriya) but turned out Brahmin by his aptitude and qualities. Maharshi Satyakam, whose knowledge and wisdom are preserved in Upanishads, was born in a Sudra family, but his temperament and knowledge made him Brahmin.
What Does Bhagavad Gita Tell?
Bhagavad Gita states that Varna is conferred based on the intrinsic nature of an individual. In Mahabharata, Yudhisthira points out that a Brahmin is not a Brahmin just because he is born in a Brahmin family.
Of course, the ideal Varna vyavasta sluggishly transformed into a system based on birth, but it had only four Varnas, unlike today. Even the altered Varan vyavasta was successful without much rebellion because of the trust and tolerance of the people.
Britishers misconceived the concept of Varna as a hereditary one. Sir Herbert Hope Risley, a race scientist, a man who adores racism, was the in-charge of the formal application of the caste system to the entire Hindu population of British India in the 1901 census.
When British men arrived in India, the weaver community was 2 lakh members. But as the British levied more taxes on them, oppressed them, and even chopped a few weaver’s hands and made weaving a timorous job, the community shrank to 20 thousand within one decade.
This shows that even after the Britishers came, people had the freedom to change their profession, which is not allowed in a severe caste system.
It makes no sense to say all barbers belong to the Nayee caste, and their next generations must become barbers. But, that is what the mighty British Empire’s ethnographer, Sir Risley, had done to our society. The Britishers started to call Jati’s names caste names.
The British System
The worst and most demonic part of this work came when Sir Risley started ranking these castes. The Jatis, which allied or worked for Britishers or were economically better, were given the top rank in the list. (Upper Castes)
For example, Many people in Reddy’s Jati from Andhra Pradesh (In Rayalaseema) were the ones who collected taxes for the British government. Now they are in the Open caste category. The same Reddy’s Jati in Karnataka comes under the backward caste category, maybe because its members didn’t labor for Britishers.
The upper caste was given the privilege of oppressing the people from lower castes. Caste was enforced by making it compulsory to mention any work in the government offices. And even after independence, our leaders didn’t change the bureaucracy. This moderately transformed into the stringent caste system today.
The main objective of Britishers behind this was to bring a division into the Hindu masses. Caste is not something indigenous to Hinduism. Even Christians and Muslims in India (in some areas) have a caste system.
In almost all temples, there is no discrimination based on caste, but in many churches in Kerala, lower caste Christians are not allowed to enter higher caste Christian churches.
Castes like Dudekula Laddaf, Pinjarra, Arekatika, and so on are all Muslim castes in India. Caste is a cooked-up part of Indian society (not just Hindu society) by the colonial rulers.
I hope all such systems which create differences will be thrashed and rejected by people shortly. Jai Hind.
By Charan Pailla,
-Inspired by Rajiv Malhotra