The world was created as one by the Almighty, and today, humanity has succeeded in dividing it. The Mediterranean sea, as it washed 3-year-old Alan Kuridi’s body ashore, screamed out to question this fact and the whole human race hanged its head in shame as it watched this innocent, vibrant life’s splayed face down at the shore, his unforeseeable future washed away.
Alan Kurdi and his family of four, in their third attempt to escape the war-hit Syria and in the hope of finding a better future, had left for the Greek island of Kos, but little did they know that this attempt would be their last one and one that would stand to haunt the father, Abdullah for the rest of his life.
Over centuries, people have demarcated lands. Many lives have been claimed by politics, unmindful of the heavy causalities that have served as the price of these fits of covetousness. To the minds of the “Men of the World,” these have been collateral damages, but would one be able to shrug off this loss of life as easily after exposing themselves to a deeper and possibly a more personal inspection of the loss of the life of this child? At the same time, they tried to flee to Europe “illegally.”
Following this sad loss, a volley of criticism was largely directed at Europe and its refusal to accept immigrants at large. The reasons for such vehement reactions or stands of these countries’ governments are, without a doubt, dictated by fear of economic, political, and religious changes, to say the least.
One of Europe’s major worries is the changes that large-scale immigration can bring about to the voting bank of the same since a poll revealed that 67% of the people of Europe wanted the government to deploy armies to keep refugees out.
On economic grounds, Europe claims that it is not strong enough to support mass immigration, but this is hard to believe. Branko Milanovic, in his blog, rightly states that “it might seem odd to an impartial observer that rich Europe of more than 1/2 billion people is unable to cope with one hundred thousand migrants and refugees while much poorer Turkey has accepted 1.7 million refugees from Syria” and the unwillingness of Europe to be of help renders a staggering blow to the human morale.
While different politicos are substantiating Europe’s self-serving motives, the underlying reasons for Europe’s decisions will leave one aghast. From worldly, materialistic motives, one now comes down to spiritual ones. In contrast, religion originated to unite and instil faith and hope in people; today, that is the very reason for Europe’s reluctant attitude towards refugees. On the one hand, xenophobia has been supposed as a leading factor in not wanting to accommodate the refugees. On the other hand, Europe is terrified by the impact immigration might have on Europe culturally.
With Islam rapidly buying up European churches, Europe is now afraid of the religious implications and how the Syrians’ culture, which is different in every way, can affect the present norms and ways of living of the country they migrate to. While at a European Union summit that is to happen this week, leaders deliberate on how to go about the situation and manage the crisis effectively. The fate and the lives of the refugees hang in the balance.
On the other hand, politicians and militants play the blame game, and at the end of the day, one realizes that no matter who the culprit in this succession of violent massacres is, it is always the innocent who pay the price. Thus, the overwhelming pathos of the situation forces the world to take some time out of their busy, chaotic lives and focus their minds on the crisis at hand for a few moments.
Is the demand of ISIS wanting to become a superpower a reasonable one? Obviously not. But are they the only ones on whom we rest our hopes, thinking that someday they will desist, or until our time comes, we should live in ignorance?
In this world of social constructs where we draw the norms and define what is legal or illegal, can we term refugees who attempt to flee to other countries because they want to save their lives “illegal”? As it is, the lives of God know how many more Alan Kurdis are at grave peril. Do we need to jeopardize their lives even further by refusing them the legal means of reaching and surviving in a different country?
God made humanity as a whole, and humans have divided and constructed walls instead of mending bridges worldwide. While we tenaciously fight for “rights” and try to protect “our” people, we are losing sight of our priorities.
A sense of belonging for one’s countrymen is commendable, but the need of the hour is for strong countries to set aside petty differences and lend a helping hand to the ones in danger as a whole. After all, “immigration” wouldn’t be termed so if it wasn’t for our race who divided it in the first place. God does not want immigration, for God didn’t envision any of us as immigrants.
Author Bio
Oindrila Gupta
Oindrila is a Delhi University student with a passion for Literature, and her hobbies include music and dance. Apart from this, she is also a voracious reader and hopes to establish a career as an editor someday. Meanwhile, she finds joy in little things and strives to impact her writings to touch whatever lives she can.
Last Updated on by Sathi